October 06, 2006 06:54 PM UTC

Analyzing who the sex scandalizers are

• 3 Comments
• by: parsingreality

The spin machine is humming on Heavy Duty cycle as it tries to equate Dems as equally opportunity perps.  I have been poking around the net for a few years looking for information on who the immoral, the hypocrites, and the home breakers are.  Always, hands down, the Family Value Republicans take the prizes home.  Here’s my thinking:

First, can we agree that both party’s members of congress abuse their power and have affairs?  Mostly with the other sex, sometimes the same.  Perhaps part of this is due to the “Type A” personalities, male or female, that is needed to get one there.  Once this is set aside as a given, sex scandals suddenly become a lonely, virtually Republican territory.

Since the Republicans have taken the mantle of “Family Values”, they have to wear it for good or ill.  I take their Family Values definition to mean lifelong marriages and not fooling around on one’s partner, always of the other sex.  So, any MoC espousing Family Values and is divorced or adulterous, is a hypocrite right out of the gate.  You might note, Bible thumpers, that the only thing Jesus never forgave is hypocrisy.  Speaking with a forked tongue for this side of the Atlantic.  One might have a divorce and be adulterous, but if those actions are not held up as absolute behavioral values, one is not a hypocrite.  One could start with the divorced, womanizing while single Ronald Reagan, but that would be criticizing God, wouldn’ it?

Similarly, if one does not thump the gay issues and is found out to be gay, there is no hypocrisy.  On the other hand, we see the fear of homosexuality by those who are gay, and in denial as projected onto those who are and are out.

http://www.humaneven…  has scraped up a list of ten heinous Democratic sexual scandals.  Lesseeeeee……hmmmmmm.  Nope, no Family Values hypocrisy there.  Abuse of power, yes.  An inaccurate description of the events with Barney Frank, and they got the wrong one for Ted Kennedy.  (I would count the Mary Jo Kopechne affair as a scandal, not being a witness in a family member’s court case.)

OK, so we have three Dems walking a border on “under age” or (legal, BTW, in most states) 16 year olds.  Hold that fact.

http://www.dkosopedi… lists dozens and dozens of Republican sex scandals.  Too many for me to bother counting.  Names, dates, facts.  Most of them are either of the hypocrite category or kiddy diddling.  Searching in page, “children” comes up twelve times.  Counting “year” connected to age of victims, , 27 I think, the number got too high for my fingers and toes.  Handily for even numbered math, that’s 9:1 ratio of kid crimes compared to the Human Events page.  Ladies and gentlemen, that is what is called “statistically significant”, far beyond any margin of error. It’s a sick, sick list of raping 8 year olds, possessing porn showing the rape of a 5 year old, daughter rape, etc.  Sick puppies on that side of the aisle!  Where are the Democratic kiddy porn owning, daughter raping, members of Congress?

I understand that you won’t find Dems on a page about Repubs, but I ask readers, seriously, to provide examples of Democratic pedophilia.  Even allegations!

http://www.lavenderl… has it’s list with must more detail and even appropriate Bible verses for those Republican sinners.

Google “Republican Sex Scandals” and the same for Democratic.  There are 62,800 hits for the former, 45 for the latter.  Are left leaning webmasters fixated on the topic?  Are their right leaning compatriots too lazy to dig things up?  Or, is there a dearth of material for the Dems?  I report, you pnder.  Keep in mind that 1,395.555:1 ratio as to try to explain away this one.

There are many other lists via the aforementioned Google searches.  I do remember one that I saved and have apparently lost, that had 33 Reppublican sex scandals and had 9 Dems.  Again, statistically significant.

Let me say it again:  Get me some Democratic “Family Value” failures, or Democratic pedophiles! What I find is so lop-sided that there can only be two answers: Bad, biased research or………